News

Protesters Said Charlotte Police Trapped Them. A State Report Claims They Had “Clear” Ways to Escape.

Multiple North Carolina lawmakers slammed city police for their handling of the June 2 clash in uptown Charlotte, which followed George Floyd’s killing.

In this May file photo, demonstrators marched in Charlotte after George Floyd's death in Minneapolis. (Photo by Grant Baldwin for Cardinal & PIne)

Multiple state lawmakers slammed city police for their handling of the June 2 clash in uptown Charlotte.

A new State Bureau of Investigation report says Charlotte police did not trap protesters during a June 2 incident in uptown Charlotte, despite the claims of many demonstrators present that night.ย 

The clash between police officers in riot gear and protestors had been captured on video (around the 1 hour, 44 minute mark) and live-streamed by Queen City Nerve, an alternative newspaper.

Demonstrators said the video shows Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department officers trapping a group of protesters between two parking garages, and then firing tear gas and pepper balls on them from overhead positions, a practice forbidden by the police departmentโ€™s protocol.

After noting that no body camera footage of the incident was available โ€” because Civil Emergency Units are unable to mount the cameras on their uniforms โ€” the SBI report states that video of the clash from multiple sources shows โ€œtwo clear areas behind the protesters for escape.โ€

RELATED: State Senator: Charlotte Police At Fault in Clash With Protesters

โ€œSmoke was observed in both avenues of escape, but no officers are seen blocking protesters for either option,โ€ the review said. โ€œSmokeโ€ in the review refers to banks of tear gas.

The bureauโ€™s findings have been criticized by eyewitnesses of the incident, who say the only avenue of escape was to force a parking garage gate open and run into the structure. Police then followed protestors into the garage, witnesses alleged. 

As previously reported by Cardinal & Pine, State Sen. Jeff Jackson, a Mecklenburg County Democrat, released his own review of the June 2 โ€œkettlingโ€ incident prior to the SBIโ€™s report. Jackson condemned CMPDโ€™s tactics and use of riot control agents.

โ€œThe use of tear gas, essentially boxing in the protesters, was wrong,โ€ Jackson wrote, adding that trapping protestors served no tactical purpose, particularly if the intent was to disperse the crowd. โ€œDoing so demonstrates a willingness to induce fear and panic for its own sake,โ€ he added.

The SBI report also claims that only one police officer fired six pepper balls from above, striking a parking garage wall. However, both Jackson and the alt-weekly Queen City Nerve published photos that purportedly show more pepper ball hits on the wall.

โ€œCMPD policy is to shoot at the ground,โ€ Jackson wrote. โ€œIt is clear that [police] were not firing at the ground but at the protesters and that at least one officer fired a shot at eye-level and struck a protester in the face.โ€ 

In the wake of incident, more than 50 complaints were filed against the department, resulting in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina.

In response to the suit, A North Carolina Superior Court judge granted a temporary restraining order barring CMPD  from using force against demonstrators for 10 days. 

A CMPD statement released on Friday read, โ€œThe order does notโ€ฆprevent the department from deploying riot control agents in gatherings that involve protesters who are damaging the property of others.โ€ 

As Cardinal & Pine reported, The Charlotte City Council responded to public outcry over the incident by voting on June 8 to remove funding for the current supply and future purchases of chemical agents such as tear gas and pepper balls used for crowd dispersal.ย 

One week after the councilโ€™s decision U.S. Representative Alma Adams, a Democrat from Mecklenburg County, introduced The Right to PROTEST Act, which would criminalize the use of tear gas and other riot control agents nationwide.

โ€œThe right to protest police misconduct is under threat from police misconduct itself,โ€ Adam said in a video this month.