tr?id=&ev=PageView&noscript=

Republican NC Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin uses anti-abortion rhetoric

By Michael McElroy

November 19, 2023

Judge Jefferson Griffin and another judge ruled that a mother could lose parental rights because she committed a crime while pregnant.

A North Carolina judge who ruled that a mother could lose her parental rights because she committed a serious crime while pregnant is running for the state’s highest court.

Judge Jefferson Griffin was part of a three-judge panel of the state court of appeals that ruled unanimously last month that a Durham woman could lose custody of her youngest child because she was pregnant with her at the time she was convicted of abusing another child. 

State law allows for the termination of parental rights when a serious assault is committed against a child in the household. But Griffin and the judge who wrote the decision, Judge Hunter Murphy, ruled that this also applies to children in utero because, they said, “life begins at conception.”

(The third judge on the panel, a Democrat, agreed with the decision to remove custody, but did not support the reasoning.)

The ruling sparked widespread criticism from legal experts who pointed out the dangerous precedent such reasoning would establish.

“Imagine putting a mother in jail because authorities determined that, over the course of her pregnancy, she should have exercised more, drank less coffee and taken more prenatal vitamins,” NC Newsline wrote about the case. 

Griffin is running for the NC Supreme Court seat currently held by Justice Allison Riggs, a Democrat whom Gov. Roy Cooper appointed this year when Justice Michael Morgan said he would run for governor instead of re-election. 

Ruling is withdrawn after backlash

Judges Griffin and Murphy based their reasoning on a 1949 NC Supreme Court ruling that an “unborn infant” had the same rights to inherit their parents’ property as their older siblings.

“Biologically speaking, the life of a human being begins at the moment of conception,” that court ruled. 

But that ruling also made it very clear that this standard applied only to property rights and inheritance. 

“Ordinarily a different rule or definition is applied as to when life begins, in tort actions and in criminal statutes.”

Judges Griffin and Hunter ignored or missed that part, advocates said.

The “life begins at conception” argument is a favorite of anti-abortion rights groups, including many who are seeking to ban abortion entirely in the state. It is likely that the state supreme court, which has a 5-2 Republican majority at the moment, will hear an abortion case of some kind over the next eight years. 

On November 10, after three weeks of heavy criticism, Griffin and the other two judges withdrew their ruling. 

It is unclear if or when they will issue a new ruling.

Author

  • Michael McElroy

    Michael McElroy is Cardinal & Pine's political correspondent. He is an adjunct instructor at UNC-Chapel Hill's Hussman School of Journalism and Media, and a former editor at The New York Times.

CATEGORIES:

Support Our Cause

Thank you for taking the time to read our work. Before you go, we hope you'll consider supporting our values-driven journalism, which has always strived to make clear what's really at stake for North Carolinians and our future.

Since day one, our goal here at Cardinal & Pine has always been to empower people across the state with fact-based news and information. We believe that when people are armed with knowledge about what's happening in their local, state, and federal governments—including who is working on their behalf and who is actively trying to block efforts aimed at improving the daily lives of North Carolina families—they will be inspired to become civically engaged.

Billy Ball
Billy Ball, Senior Community Editor
Your support keeps us going
Help us continue delivering fact-based news to North Carolinians
The Cardinal & Pine Holiday Food Guide

The Cardinal & Pine Holiday Food Guide

Struggling to put together a spread for your holiday gatherings? We’ve got you covered. North Carolina is a state of grand fortune, with scores of...

Related Stories
Opinion: Mark Robinson wants to take away our rights and freedoms

Opinion: Mark Robinson wants to take away our rights and freedoms

A North Carolina woman says Mark Robinson's latest ad is trying to soften his stance on abortion rights, but she says he's an extremist who would support a total abortion ban. When I saw Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson’s new ad earlier this month, I had to do a...

Jeff Jackson on what he’d do as NC attorney general

Jeff Jackson on what he’d do as NC attorney general

The next attorney general will play a huge role in shaping the direction of North Carolina. In an interview, Democrat Jeff Jackson explains how his vision for the state differs from that of his opponent, Dan Bishop. Jeff Jackson’s done a lot of things in his life. He...

Share This